V. ZAITSEV
18.02.2005, 13:55
Совпадение логики у представителей одной профессии в разных странах, континентах иногда просто восхищает. Ведь приведенная ниже выделенная красным строка, как будто списана из нашего форума. И больше НИЧЕГО, абсолютно нулевой интерес: по физиологическим эффектам, механизмам, дозам, показаниям и противопоказаниям и т.п. Зато уж какой мощный апломб резолюций, типа: «мягко говоря (! :) ), шарлатанская терапия» или там «отпетые жулики». Сразу чувствуется значимость авторов.
Сначала небольшая справка.
MAJID ALI, M.D.
Professor of Medicine of Capital University of Integrative Medicine, Washington, D.C.
Editor, The Journal of Integrative Medicine
Formerly, Associate Professor of Pathology (adj.),
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York
Formerly, President of Staff and Chief Pathologist, Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, NJ
Fellow, Royal College of Surgeons of England
Diplomate, American Board of Anatomic and Clinical Pathology
Diplomate, American Boards of Environmental Medicine
Past President Capital University of Integrative Medicine
Это как раз один из тех врачей, у которых:
«My personal experience supports ozone therapists. Ozone gives me positive results in the majority of the patients for whom I use that therapy»
И даже порой, когда «total discouragement with physicians and official therapy».Понимаю, вот это уже (последнее) озонотерапии простить невозможно. :)
А теперь сама цитата.
From Office Contact Information.
…………………………………………………………..
"There is no known scientific evidence that ozone works for anything. If there was any evidence, why wouldn't The New England Journal of Medicine publish such evidence?," the drugs doctors tell their patients. That makes ozone therapy quackery. "The scientific evidence of efficacy is not known to you because you are ignorant of holistic literature," the ozone therapists respond with sarcasm. "There are hundreds of published papers that demonstrate the many clinical benefits of ozone therapies. Why don't you read those papers?" That makes ozone useful.
Сначала небольшая справка.
MAJID ALI, M.D.
Professor of Medicine of Capital University of Integrative Medicine, Washington, D.C.
Editor, The Journal of Integrative Medicine
Formerly, Associate Professor of Pathology (adj.),
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York
Formerly, President of Staff and Chief Pathologist, Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, NJ
Fellow, Royal College of Surgeons of England
Diplomate, American Board of Anatomic and Clinical Pathology
Diplomate, American Boards of Environmental Medicine
Past President Capital University of Integrative Medicine
Это как раз один из тех врачей, у которых:
«My personal experience supports ozone therapists. Ozone gives me positive results in the majority of the patients for whom I use that therapy»
И даже порой, когда «total discouragement with physicians and official therapy».Понимаю, вот это уже (последнее) озонотерапии простить невозможно. :)
А теперь сама цитата.
From Office Contact Information.
…………………………………………………………..
"There is no known scientific evidence that ozone works for anything. If there was any evidence, why wouldn't The New England Journal of Medicine publish such evidence?," the drugs doctors tell their patients. That makes ozone therapy quackery. "The scientific evidence of efficacy is not known to you because you are ignorant of holistic literature," the ozone therapists respond with sarcasm. "There are hundreds of published papers that demonstrate the many clinical benefits of ozone therapies. Why don't you read those papers?" That makes ozone useful.